Justine Dolorfino

Posts tagged politics

0 notes &

State of the Union 2010 & GOP Response: Education

I just wanted to archive the text dealing with education for my own personal purposes; hopefully others may find this useful. The following makes me very optimistic, which exactly how I want to feel regarding the future of the United States. I also want the government to back up these ideas with actual concrete change and positive growth, of course, so we’ll see what happens.

Now, this year, we’ve broken through the stalemate between left and right by launching a national competition to improve our schools. And the idea here is simple: Instead of rewarding failure, we only reward success. Instead of funding the status quo, we only invest in reform — reform that raises student achievement; inspires students to excel in math and science; and turns around failing schools that steal the future of too many young Americans, from rural communities to the inner city. In the 21st century, the best anti-poverty program around is a world-class education. (Applause.) And in this country, the success of our children cannot depend more on where they live than on their potential.

When we renew the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, we will work with Congress to expand these reforms to all 50 states. Still, in this economy, a high school diploma no longer guarantees a good job. That’s why I urge the Senate to follow the House and pass a bill that will revitalize our community colleges, which are a career pathway to the children of so many working families. (Applause.)

To make college more affordable, this bill will finally end the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that go to banks for student loans. (Applause.) Instead, let’s take that money and give families a $10,000 tax credit for four years of college and increase Pell Grants. (Applause.) And let’s tell another one million students that when they graduate, they will be required to pay only 10 percent of their income on student loans, and all of their debt will be forgiven after 20 years — and forgiven after 10 years if they choose a career in public service, because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they chose to go to college. (Applause.)

And by the way, it’s time for colleges and universities to get serious about cutting their own costs — (applause) — because they, too, have a responsibility to help solve this problem.

Source

As a bonus, here’s what the GOP response had to say about education (because education really should be something that can cross party lines, I feel):

The President and I agree on expanding the number of high-quality charter schools, and rewarding teachers for excellent performance. More school choices for parents and students mean more accountability and greater achievement.

A child’s educational opportunity should be determined by her intellect and work ethic, not by her zip code.

Source

Your thoughts? Are you as hopeful as I am regarding educational reform and progress in the United States? Are you skeptical?

Filed under politics education

0 notes &

Professor Is a Label That Leans to the Left

There are some really interesting things pointed out in this research. Here are the key points I took from the NYT’s summary:

  • There is some sort of typecasting going on with the profession. The societal image of a professor is someone with a liberal bias, so it’s almost like a self-fulfilling prophecy: if you think about whether or not you don’t fit the typecasting and make that salient to yourself, the chances of you not aiming for that profession become lower.
  • Similarly, I agree with the ideas of “fitting in”; once you find yourself in the field, you might begin to take on certain characteristics (as stereotypical as some may be) you see in the people around you. This kind of identity formation suits itself to a type of in-group “we’re in this field” v. out-group “you are not” idea, with an emphasis being placed on the characteristics and ideals that separate the two groups. Indeed, “choosing an occupation is part of fashioning an identity,” Mitchell L. Stevens, a Stanford education professor, states.
  • I think it’s important to think about the fact that other professions are “politically typed”. Would some of the professions mentioned as being liberal-dominated (“journalism, art, fashion, social work, and therapy”) benefit from the different viewpoints and perspectives conservatives may be able to contribute? I could definitely see that being true for academia.
  • The connection the authors make with the research interests and associations of sociology and liberal ideals is really interesting to me. I think the same could easily be true for my other undergraduate major, psychology.
  • Speaking of psychology, I just really enjoy their methodology. Anecdotal data can often not be extrapolated to the general public.
  • My own experience with the teachers and professors I’ve had over the years has led me to conclude that I’ve seen this at work. Also, I identify as a liberal and majored in psychology and music; I totally fit the bill. That’s really interesting.

Filed under college graduate school politics identity